• Українська
  • Русский
  • English
Where there is no law, but every man does what is right in his own eyes, there is the least of real liberty
Henry M. Robert

Yukhym Rudmynsky’s Joyful Message

21 October, 2003 - 00:00

A noted artist almost always cuts an enigmatic figure in the public eye. People wonder about his talent, special vision of the world, and an ability to not only observe, but also look into the essence and logic of existence.

Yukhym Durmynsky passed away nine years ago and his name has since marked a certain phase of this epoch.

His childhood was marked by poverty and hunger, yet he was fortunate enough to come across a person who would become his true teacher: artist A. Balazovsky who saw in a quiet youth attending his classes an extraordinary personality. Later (the artist notes in his brief autobiography), “by the will of God and in the person of artist Mykola Hlushchenko (he happened to notice my works), I was enrolled in a school of art.” Still later, he joined a department of architecture, and after graduation received a job with the Kyivmistobud Urban-planning Research Institute of Kyiv, the only job he would ever have. He would describe that period, “I remember the way I felt rather than dates.”

No one knew at the time that Yukhym Rudmynsky was not only a gifted architect, but also an extraordinary and fruitful painter. For his colleagues it was a stunning discovery.

Now that we know him as both, art critics argue which of his talents was more significant. S. Kileso, Candidate of Architecture, insists on the priority of Rudmynsky’s architectural attainments, saying that he constantly took part in international contests in Paris, Berlin, Madrid, and in Japan: “the remarkable thing is that he always received prestigious prizes.” Here is a far from exhausting list of his major architectural projects: the resort complexes Verkhovyna and Shayany in Zakarpattia, Pivdenny in Phoros (Crimea), and the Russian Embassy in Kyiv. Kileso notes that Rudmynsky was the first to look for national forms in Ukrainian architecture, not by borrowing but by creatively conceiving them. His Holodomor and Babyn Yar memorials turned out very special. The latter reflects the artist’s idea to use various shapes of rock (rock being a symbol of tragedy and eternity), gradually reduced in size, as though vanishing, thus illustrating the tragedy of the Jewish people.

Rudmynsky said, “I regard the arts as a single current of culture in time (without the past, present, and future), belonging to the mystery of existence.” This statement is perhaps a key to understanding his concept of the fine arts.

His creative heritage (over a thousand canvases and prints) became known only after Rudmynsky’s death. His works are amazingly diversified in terms of style, trend, and technique — the impression is that his inner world was tremendous and constantly changing, and that he was in a hurry to convey at least something of what he saw and knew. Series of subtle lyrical and slightly mournful landscapes, the quick-passing lower Kyiv neighborhood of Podil, the arresting Crimea, tender and scenic Carpathian Mountains, and the enigmatic sadness of the Baltic countries.

The Biblical Prophets cycle reveals emotionally gripping pictures that make visitors stop and spend a long time exploring each, staring at faces looking back across thousands of years. There is a definite Beethovenian touch to Rudmynsky’s portraits: suffering and sage awareness of the cross one is destined to bear. Art critic Yuri Neiman wrote, “It is eternal sorrow — perhaps not even sorrow but a lasting, quiet and a little sad reflection on an individual being above time and space, but having to exist at a certain period, in a certain space, and to give everything to that space.”

Klavdiya, Yukhym Rudmynsky’s wife, is the keeper of his legacy and organizer of his exhibits in Ukrainian cities. There is a web site most comprehensively illustrating his versatile creative attainments, and there is an excellent album.

By Natalia TIMURSHAYEVA
Rubric: